Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs ERBIX
CWGCX vs ERBIX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs ERBIX
CWGCX vs ERBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. ERBIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and ERBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. ERBIX (580M). ERBIX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: ERBIX (0.95) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than ERBIX: CWGCX (25 years) vs ERBIX (16 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than ERBIX (0.88). ERBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBIX: CWGCX (250) vs ERBIX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. ERBIX (9.45). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. ERBIX (1.39).
| CWGCX | ERBIX | CWGCX / ERBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.87 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.88 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 11.619 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 580M | 27,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 9.45 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 23.88 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 1.39 | 2,015% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 57.88 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement