Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FTGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTGFX (9.21B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FTGFX (0.80) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. FTGFX (-1.07). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.26 vs. FTGFX (23.02).
| CWGCX | FTGFX | CWGCX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.809 | 4.219 | 304% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 9.21B | 1,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.80 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | -1.07 | -1,233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 24.36 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.26 | 23.02 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | 44.59 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement