Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FTGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTGFX (9.01B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FTGFX (0.79) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGCX (26 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. FTGFX (-3.96). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. FTGFX (24.70).
| CWGCX | FTGFX | CWGCX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 4.395 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 9.01B | 1,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.79 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -3.96 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 27.15 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 24.70 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 41.82 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers