Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and FTGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTGFX (9.19B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FTGFX (0.80) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FTGFX (4.35). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. FTGFX (23.26).
| CWGCX | FTGFX | CWGCX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 4.219 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 9.19B | 1,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 4.35 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 29.07 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 23.26 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 54.08 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers