Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGFX
CWGCX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and FTGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FTGFX (9.37B). FTGFX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FTGFX (0.80) vs CWGCX (0.72). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. FTGFX (1.03). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. FTGFX (29.11).
| CWGCX | FTGFX | CWGCX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.73 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 7.138 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 9.37B | 1,665% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.80 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 1.03 | 1,580% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 31.69 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 29.11 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | 43.89 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement