Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGQX
CWGCX vs FTGQX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGQX
CWGCX vs FTGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGQX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and FTGQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTGQX (9.19B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: CWGCX (0.75) vs FTGQX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGQX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTGQX (8 years). FTGQX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGQX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGQX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FTGQX (2.73). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. FTGQX (16.65).
| CWGCX | FTGQX | CWGCX / FTGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 3.705 | 352% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 9.19B | 1,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 2.73 | 657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 24.34 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 16.65 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement