Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTGQX
CWGCX vs FTGQX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTGQX
CWGCX vs FTGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTGQX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FTGQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTGQX (9.21B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: CWGCX (0.71) vs FTGQX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTGQX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTGQX (8 years). FTGQX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGQX: CWGCX (250) vs FTGQX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. FTGQX (-2.59). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.26 vs. FTGQX (16.38).
| CWGCX | FTGQX | CWGCX / FTGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.809 | 3.632 | 353% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 9.21B | 1,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | -2.59 | -511% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 19.79 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.26 | 16.38 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement