Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTWRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and FTWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTWRX (2.91B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGCX (0.75) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTWRX (0.78). FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGCX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FTWRX (9.81). FTWRX (28.40) and CWGCX (28.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CWGCX | FTWRX | CWGCX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.76 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.78 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 7.355 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 2.91B | 5,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 9.81 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 44.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 28.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 50.14 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers