Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTWRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FTWRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTWRX (2.9B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGCX (0.71) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGCX (26 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTWRX (0.78). FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGCX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. FTWRX (-1.48). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. FTWRX (27.41).
| CWGCX | FTWRX | CWGCX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.76 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.78 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 5.839 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.9B | 5,441% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -1.48 | -718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 39.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 27.41 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 36.05 | 252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers