Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FTWRX
CWGCX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FTWRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FTWRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTWRX (2.9B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGCX (0.71) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FTWRX (0.78). FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGCX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. FTWRX (3.05). FTWRX (27.39) and CWGCX (27.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CWGCX | FTWRX | CWGCX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.76 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.78 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.809 | 6.794 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.9B | 5,448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 3.05 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 37.37 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.26 | 27.39 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | 40.01 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers