Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs GDGSX
CWGCX vs GDGSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs GDGSX
CWGCX vs GDGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. GDGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and GDGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. GDGSX (66.3M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than GDGSX: CWGCX (0.75) vs GDGSX (0.38). CWGCX was incepted earlier than GDGSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs GDGSX (18 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than GDGSX (1.25). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GDGSX (3.52). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GDGSX: CWGCX (250) vs GDGSX (5000). GDGSX (18.72) and CWGCX (17.91) have marching annual gain over last year. GDGSX return over 5 years is better than : 58.44 vs. CWGCX (28.03).
| CWGCX | GDGSX | CWGCX / GDGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.25 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.25 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 7.484 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 66.3M | 241,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.38 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 18.72 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 57.29 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 58.44 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 197.74 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement