Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs IGFSX
CWGCX vs IGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs IGFSX
CWGCX vs IGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. IGFSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and IGFSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. IGFSX (63.1M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than IGFSX: CWGCX (0.75) vs IGFSX (0.23). CWGCX was incepted earlier than IGFSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs IGFSX (24 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than IGFSX (1.29). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IGFSX (32.00). IGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: IGFSX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. IGFSX (-39.42). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. IGFSX (-49.25).
| CWGCX | IGFSX | CWGCX / IGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | -11.326 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 63.1M | 253,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.23 | 322% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -39.42 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | -39.36 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | -49.25 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | -36.77 | -268% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers