Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs IGFSX
CWGCX vs IGFSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs IGFSX
CWGCX vs IGFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. IGFSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and IGFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. IGFSX (65.1M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than IGFSX: CWGCX (0.71) vs IGFSX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than IGFSX: CWGCX (26 years) vs IGFSX (24 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than IGFSX (1.29). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IGFSX (32.00). IGFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: IGFSX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. IGFSX (-36.61). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. IGFSX (-60.60).
| CWGCX | IGFSX | CWGCX / IGFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | -33.517 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 65.1M | 242,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -36.61 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | -50.98 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | -60.60 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | -50.32 | -180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement