Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs IILGX
CWGCX vs IILGX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs IILGX
CWGCX vs IILGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. IILGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and IILGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. IILGX (2.53B). IILGX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: IILGX (1.37) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than IILGX: CWGCX (25 years) vs IILGX (29 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than IILGX (0.64). IILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than IILGX: CWGCX (250) vs IILGX (2000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. IILGX (13.26). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. IILGX (10.21).
| CWGCX | IILGX | CWGCX / IILGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.64 | 231% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.64 | 231% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 9.255 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 2.53B | 6,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.37 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 13.26 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 34.36 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 10.21 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 51.84 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers