Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs IVGTX
CWGCX vs IVGTX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs IVGTX
CWGCX vs IVGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. IVGTX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and IVGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. IVGTX (66.3M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than IVGTX: CWGCX (0.75) vs IVGTX (0.38). CWGCX was incepted earlier than IVGTX: CWGCX (25 years) vs IVGTX (24 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than IVGTX (1.14). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IVGTX (32.00). IVGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: IVGTX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.62 vs. IVGTX (-39.92). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. IVGTX (-47.56).
| CWGCX | IVGTX | CWGCX / IVGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.14 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.14 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.030 | -10.450 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 66.3M | 241,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.38 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | -39.92 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.33 | -36.83 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.81 | -47.56 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.79 | -36.13 | -249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement