Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs JSLNX
CWGCX vs JSLNX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs JSLNX
CWGCX vs JSLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. JSLNX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and JSLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. JSLNX (3.28B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than JSLNX: CWGCX (0.71) vs JSLNX (0.52). CWGCX was incepted earlier than JSLNX: CWGCX (25 years) vs JSLNX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than JSLNX (0.69). JSLNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JSLNX: CWGCX (250) vs JSLNX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. JSLNX (6.85). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. JSLNX (12.75).
| CWGCX | JSLNX | CWGCX / JSLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.69 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.69 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.930 | 10.687 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 3.28B | 4,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.52 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | 6.85 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.91 | 32.45 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 12.75 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement