Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCAX
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCAX
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCAX (392M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCAX (0.54). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCAX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: CWGCX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX (17.10) and CWGCX (16.95) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.83 vs. CWGCX (28.08).
| CWGCX | LGCAX | CWGCX / LGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.90 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.04 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.279 | 7.122 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 392M | 40,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.54 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 17.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 69.33 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.08 | 36.83 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers