Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCAX
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCAX
CWGCX vs LGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCAX (392M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCAX: CWGCX (0.71) vs LGCAX (0.53). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCAX: CWGCX (26 years) vs LGCAX (10 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCAX (1.04). LGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCAX: CWGCX (250) vs LGCAX (1500). LGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. CWGCX (10.62). LGCAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | LGCAX | CWGCX / LGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.90 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.04 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 10.508 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 392M | 40,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.53 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 11.79 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 72.55 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 39.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement