Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCFX (392M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCFX (0.89). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX (19.29) and LGCFX (18.84) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. CWGCX (31.49).
| CWGCX | LGCFX | CWGCX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.89 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.147 | 7.189 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 392M | 40,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.38 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 18.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.14 | 68.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.49 | 41.37 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement