Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCFX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (404M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGCX (0.72) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCFX (10 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCFX (0.89). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.92 vs. CWGCX (17.01). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.95 vs. CWGCX (31.52).
| CWGCX | LGCFX | CWGCX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.89 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.609 | 12.246 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 404M | 39,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.38 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 17.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.08 | 72.32 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.52 | 42.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement