Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCFX
CWGCX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (399M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGCX (0.71) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCFX (0.89). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. CWGCX (13.47). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.31 vs. CWGCX (29.12).
| CWGCX | LGCFX | CWGCX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.89 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.866 | 8.032 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 399M | 39,599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.38 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | 16.64 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.05 | 64.86 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.12 | 41.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement