Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCOX
CWGCX vs LGCOX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCOX
CWGCX vs LGCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCOX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCOX (398M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCOX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCOX (0.66). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCOX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCOX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCOX (0.70). LGCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCOX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCOX (21.87) and CWGCX (20.87) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCOX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. CWGCX (31.28).
| CWGCX | LGCOX | CWGCX / LGCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.56 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.70 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 8.956 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 398M | 40,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 21.87 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | 75.50 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | 42.56 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement