Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCRX
CWGCX vs LGCRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCRX
CWGCX vs LGCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCRX (400M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCRX: CWGCX (0.71) vs LGCRX (0.27). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCRX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCRX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCRX (1.29). LGCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCRX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.14 vs. CWGCX (13.22). LGCRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.07 vs. CWGCX (27.26).
| CWGCX | LGCRX | CWGCX / LGCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.15 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.809 | 8.772 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 400M | 39,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.27 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 17.14 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.88 | 64.54 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.26 | 38.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers