Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCYX
CWGCX vs LGCYX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCYX
CWGCX vs LGCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCYX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCYX (397M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCYX: CWGCX (0.72) vs LGCYX (0.66). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCYX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCYX (10 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCYX (0.79). LGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCYX: CWGCX (250) vs LGCYX (1000000). LGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.47 vs. CWGCX (14.67). LGCYX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. CWGCX (29.13).
| CWGCX | LGCYX | CWGCX / LGCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.65 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.79 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.549 | 8.250 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 397M | 39,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.66 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 15.47 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 64.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 40.09 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement