Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCYX
CWGCX vs LGCYX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCYX
CWGCX vs LGCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCYX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCYX (398M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCYX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCYX (0.66). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCYX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCYX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCYX (0.79). LGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGCYX: CWGCX (250) vs LGCYX (1000000). LGCYX (21.73) and CWGCX (20.87) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCYX return over 5 years is better than : 41.88 vs. CWGCX (31.28).
| CWGCX | LGCYX | CWGCX / LGCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.65 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.79 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 8.946 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 398M | 40,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 21.73 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | 74.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | 41.88 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement