Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MCGCX
CWGCX vs MCGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MCGCX
CWGCX vs MCGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MCGCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MCGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MCGCX (624M). MCGCX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MCGCX (0.94) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MCGCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MCGCX (32 years). MCGCX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). MCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGCX: CWGCX (250) vs MCGCX (1000). MCGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.79 vs. CWGCX (20.44). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. MCGCX (14.87).
| CWGCX | MCGCX | CWGCX / MCGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.71 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.06 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.328 | 17.609 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 624M | 25,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.44 | 23.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.62 | 36.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.85 | 14.87 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.24 | 36.29 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement