Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MDGCX
CWGCX vs MDGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MDGCX
CWGCX vs MDGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MDGCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MDGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MDGCX (624M). MDGCX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MDGCX (1.04) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MDGCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MDGCX (32 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MDGCX (1.20). MDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDGCX: CWGCX (250) vs MDGCX (1000). MDGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.38 vs. CWGCX (20.20). CWGCX (32.49) and MDGCX (31.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CWGCX | MDGCX | CWGCX / MDGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.20 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.015 | 18.070 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 624M | 25,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.20 | 28.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.24 | 52.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.49 | 31.85 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.14 | 74.61 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement