Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MGISX
CWGCX vs MGISX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MGISX
CWGCX vs MGISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MGISX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MGISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MGISX (1.14B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MGISX: CWGCX (0.75) vs MGISX (0.68). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MGISX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MGISX (11 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MGISX (0.84). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MGISX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGISX: CWGCX (250) vs MGISX (5000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MGISX (-24.07). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. MGISX (-19.26).
| CWGCX | MGISX | CWGCX / MGISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.84 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.84 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | -11.130 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.14B | 14,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.68 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -24.07 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | -18.34 | -256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | -19.26 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 33.61 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers