Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MGQSX
CWGCX vs MGQSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MGQSX
CWGCX vs MGQSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MGQSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MGQSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MGQSX (21.6M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MGQSX: CWGCX (0.75) vs MGQSX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MGQSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MGQSX (13 years). MGQSX (4.93) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). MGQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGQSX: CWGCX (250) vs MGQSX (5000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MGQSX (-27.44). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. MGQSX (-27.46).
| CWGCX | MGQSX | CWGCX / MGQSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 4.93 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | -4.072 | -320% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.6M | 740,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -27.44 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | -24.63 | -190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | -27.46 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 13.89 | 711% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers