Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MGQSX
CWGCX vs MGQSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MGQSX
CWGCX vs MGQSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MGQSX commentary
Jul 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MGQSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MGQSX (21.4M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MGQSX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MGQSX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MGQSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MGQSX (13 years). MGQSX (4.93) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). MGQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGQSX: CWGCX (250) vs MGQSX (5000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.27 vs. MGQSX (-29.37). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.74 vs. MGQSX (-29.53).
| CWGCX | MGQSX | CWGCX / MGQSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.75 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 4.93 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.136 | -3.167 | -415% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.4M | 738,318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.27 | -29.37 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.36 | -26.63 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.74 | -29.53 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.83 | 9.33 | 931% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement