Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MKGCX
CWGCX vs MKGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MKGCX
CWGCX vs MKGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MKGCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MKGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MKGCX (618M). MKGCX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MKGCX (1.19) vs CWGCX (0.72). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MKGCX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MKGCX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MKGCX (0.82). MKGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKGCX: CWGCX (250) vs MKGCX (5000000). MKGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.28 vs. CWGCX (14.67). MKGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.76 vs. CWGCX (29.13).
| CWGCX | MKGCX | CWGCX / MKGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.66 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.82 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.549 | 16.999 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 618M | 25,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 22.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 50.06 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 31.76 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement