Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MKGCX
CWGCX vs MKGCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MKGCX
CWGCX vs MKGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MKGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MKGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MKGCX (627M). MKGCX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MKGCX (1.16) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MKGCX: CWGCX (26 years) vs MKGCX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MKGCX (0.82). MKGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKGCX: CWGCX (250) vs MKGCX (5000000). MKGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. CWGCX (10.62). MKGCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.91 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | MKGCX | CWGCX / MKGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.66 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.82 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 19.688 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 627M | 25,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.16 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 17.75 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 58.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 49.91 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement