Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MRGSX
CWGCX vs MRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MRGSX
CWGCX vs MRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MRGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MRGSX (623M). MRGSX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MRGSX (1.02) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MRGSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MRGSX (23 years). MRGSX (1.54) and CWGCX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . MRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). MRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MRGSX (100) vs CWGCX (250). MRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.35 vs. CWGCX (17.91). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. MRGSX (20.87).
| CWGCX | MRGSX | CWGCX / MRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.21 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.54 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 17.660 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 623M | 25,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 25.35 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 48.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 20.87 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 60.04 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement