Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSFAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MSFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSFAX (1.22B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGCX (0.75) vs MSFAX (0.50). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MSFAX (0.96). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGCX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.12 vs. MSFAX (-24.78). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.20 vs. MSFAX (-17.76).
| CWGCX | MSFAX | CWGCX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.843 | -9.578 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.22B | 13,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.50 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.12 | -24.78 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.47 | -15.51 | -280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.20 | -17.76 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.08 | 31.59 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers