Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSFAX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and MSFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. MSFAX (977M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGCX (0.72) vs MSFAX (0.49). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MSFAX (0.96). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGCX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. MSFAX (-17.97). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.70 vs. MSFAX (-14.74).
| CWGCX | MSFAX | CWGCX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.638 | -2.293 | -725% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 977M | 15,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.49 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | -17.97 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.37 | -11.65 | -441% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.70 | -14.74 | -215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.17 | 38.74 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers