Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSFAX
CWGCX vs MSFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSFAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MSFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSFAX (1.04B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSFAX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MSFAX (0.52). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSFAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MSFAX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MSFAX (0.96). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSFAX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFAX: CWGCX (250) vs MSFAX (1000000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. MSFAX (-24.63). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MSFAX (-19.64).
| CWGCX | MSFAX | CWGCX / MSFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.96 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.930 | -8.331 | -179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.04B | 15,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.52 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | -24.63 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.91 | -16.06 | -305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | -19.64 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.61 | 30.40 | 311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement