Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSGFX
CWGCX vs MSGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSGFX
CWGCX vs MSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSGFX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MSGFX (1.04B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSGFX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MSGFX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSGFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MSGFX (11 years). MSGFX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSGFX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGFX: CWGCX (250) vs MSGFX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.79 vs. MSGFX (-25.50). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.50 vs. MSGFX (-24.19).
| CWGCX | MSGFX | CWGCX / MSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.95 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.95 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.805 | -8.822 | -156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.04B | 15,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.79 | -25.50 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.93 | -20.93 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.50 | -24.19 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.93 | 19.11 | 486% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement