Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MSGFX
CWGCX vs MSGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MSGFX
CWGCX vs MSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MSGFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MSGFX (927M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MSGFX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MSGFX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MSGFX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MSGFX (11 years). MSGFX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MSGFX (35.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGFX: CWGCX (250) vs MSGFX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.90 vs. MSGFX (-27.49). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.41 vs. MSGFX (-27.84).
| CWGCX | MSGFX | CWGCX / MSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.95 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.95 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.955 | -11.630 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 927M | 17,044% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.90 | -27.49 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | -25.28 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.41 | -27.84 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.80 | 15.06 | 563% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement