Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MVGLX
CWGCX vs MVGLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MVGLX
CWGCX vs MVGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MVGLX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MVGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGLX (297M). MVGLX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MVGLX (1.07) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MVGLX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MVGLX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MVGLX (1.02). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGLX (31.00). MVGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MVGLX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.79 vs. MVGLX (0.65). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.50 vs. MVGLX (16.65).
| CWGCX | MVGLX | CWGCX / MVGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.99 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.02 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.805 | 4.877 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 297M | 53,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.79 | 0.65 | 2,263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.93 | 23.82 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.50 | 16.65 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.93 | 76.04 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers