Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MVGLX
CWGCX vs MVGLX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MVGLX
CWGCX vs MVGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MVGLX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MVGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGLX (298M). MVGLX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MVGLX (1.29) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MVGLX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MVGLX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MVGLX (1.02). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGLX (31.00). MVGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MVGLX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.66 vs. MVGLX (1.74). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.37 vs. MVGLX (17.28).
| CWGCX | MVGLX | CWGCX / MVGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.99 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.02 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.627 | 4.459 | 350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 298M | 53,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.29 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.66 | 1.74 | 1,185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.02 | 23.04 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.37 | 17.28 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.19 | 81.39 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement