Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MVGMX
CWGCX vs MVGMX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MVGMX
CWGCX vs MVGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MVGMX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MVGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGMX (297M). MVGMX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MVGMX (1.31) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MVGMX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MVGMX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MVGMX (0.77). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGMX (31.00). MVGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MVGMX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. MVGMX (0.46). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.17 vs. MVGMX (17.63).
| CWGCX | MVGMX | CWGCX / MVGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.74 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.77 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.930 | 5.010 | 298% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 297M | 53,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.18 | 0.46 | 3,286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.91 | 26.80 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 17.63 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.61 | 80.22 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement