Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MVGNX
CWGCX vs MVGNX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MVGNX
CWGCX vs MVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MVGNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and MVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. MVGNX (292M). MVGNX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MVGNX (1.60) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MVGNX: CWGCX (25 years) vs MVGNX (13 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MVGNX (0.69). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MVGNX (31.00). MVGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MVGNX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.87 vs. MVGNX (1.62). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.28 vs. MVGNX (16.46).
| CWGCX | MVGNX | CWGCX / MVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.68 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.69 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 3.043 | 501% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 292M | 54,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.60 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 1.62 | 1,285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | 24.23 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | 16.46 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | 79.06 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement