Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MWEBX
CWGCX vs MWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MWEBX
CWGCX vs MWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MWEBX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MWEBX (1.42B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than MWEBX: CWGCX (0.71) vs MWEBX (0.00). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MWEBX: CWGCX (26 years) vs MWEBX (40 years). MWEBX (1.97) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWEBX (17.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWEBX: CWGCX (250) vs MWEBX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. MWEBX (-12.88). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.95 vs. MWEBX (-34.91).
| CWGCX | MWEBX | CWGCX / MWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.92 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.97 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.424 | 5.089 | 323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.42B | 11,158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.64 | -12.88 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | -15.04 | -331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.95 | -34.91 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.88 | 7.26 | 1,252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement