Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs MWELX
CWGCX vs MWELX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs MWELX
CWGCX vs MWELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. MWELX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and MWELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. MWELX (1.4B). MWELX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: MWELX (0.91) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than MWELX: CWGCX (26 years) vs MWELX (21 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than MWELX (0.97). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. MWELX (17.00). MWELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: MWELX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. MWELX (-11.71). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. MWELX (-28.09).
| CWGCX | MWELX | CWGCX / MWELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.92 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.97 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 3.552 | 435% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 1.4B | 11,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | -11.71 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | -9.04 | -534% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | -28.09 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 26.04 | 348% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers