Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs NSRKX
CWGCX vs NSRKX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs NSRKX
CWGCX vs NSRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. NSRKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and NSRKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NSRKX (2.22B). NSRKX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: NSRKX (1.58) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than NSRKX: CWGCX (26 years) vs NSRKX (6 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NSRKX (0.24). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NSRKX (7.99). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSRKX: CWGCX (250) vs NSRKX (2500). NSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. CWGCX (10.62). NSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 49.11 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | NSRKX | CWGCX / NSRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.24 | 617% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.24 | 617% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 11.210 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.22B | 7,127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.58 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 13.24 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 57.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 49.11 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers