Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs NSRKX
CWGCX vs NSRKX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs NSRKX
CWGCX vs NSRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. NSRKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and NSRKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. NSRKX (2.29B). NSRKX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: NSRKX (1.63) vs CWGCX (0.72). CWGCX was incepted earlier than NSRKX: CWGCX (25 years) vs NSRKX (6 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NSRKX (0.24). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NSRKX (7.99). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSRKX: CWGCX (250) vs NSRKX (2500). NSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.72 vs. CWGCX (16.26). NSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 53.44 vs. CWGCX (32.96).
| CWGCX | NSRKX | CWGCX / NSRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.24 | 617% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.24 | 617% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 13.675 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 2.29B | 6,815% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.63 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 18.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 63.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 53.44 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement