Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs PGRNX
CWGCX vs PGRNX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs PGRNX
CWGCX vs PGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. PGRNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and PGRNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. PGRNX (1.69B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than PGRNX: CWGCX (0.72) vs PGRNX (0.18). CWGCX was incepted earlier than PGRNX: CWGCX (25 years) vs PGRNX (18 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PGRNX (1.18). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PGRNX (39.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRNX: CWGCX (250) vs PGRNX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. PGRNX (-3.85). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. PGRNX (-0.13).
| CWGCX | PGRNX | CWGCX / PGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 18.256 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 1.69B | 9,253% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.18 | 397% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | -3.85 | -422% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 21.13 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | -0.13 | -26,222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | 93.12 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement