Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs PGRNX
CWGCX vs PGRNX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs PGRNX
CWGCX vs PGRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. PGRNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and PGRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PGRNX (1.81B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than PGRNX: CWGCX (0.75) vs PGRNX (0.44). CWGCX was incepted earlier than PGRNX: CWGCX (25 years) vs PGRNX (18 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PGRNX (1.18). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. PGRNX (39.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGRNX: CWGCX (250) vs PGRNX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. PGRNX (3.31). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. PGRNX (8.48).
| CWGCX | PGRNX | CWGCX / PGRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 19.566 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.81B | 8,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.44 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 3.31 | 540% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 19.71 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 8.48 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | 114.84 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement