Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLAX
CWGCX vs RGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLAX
CWGCX vs RGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLAX (21.7B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: CWGCX (0.71) vs RGLAX (0.25). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLAX: CWGCX (26 years) vs RGLAX (7 years). RGLAX (1.51) and CWGCX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. CWGCX (10.62). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | RGLAX | CWGCX / RGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.51 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.51 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 9.492 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.25 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 13.36 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 56.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 47.15 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers