Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLBX
CWGCX vs RGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLBX
CWGCX vs RGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and RGLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLBX (21.5B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLBX: CWGCX (0.75) vs RGLBX (0.30). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLBX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLBX (7 years). RGLBX (1.53) and CWGCX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLBX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.99 vs. CWGCX (17.91). RGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.55 vs. CWGCX (28.03).
| CWGCX | RGLBX | CWGCX / RGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.53 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.53 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 7.871 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.30 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 19.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 53.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 45.55 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers