Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLBX
CWGCX vs RGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLBX
CWGCX vs RGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and RGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. RGLBX (21.5B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLBX: CWGCX (0.72) vs RGLBX (0.30). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLBX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLBX (7 years). RGLBX (1.53) and CWGCX (1.48) have similar cost to investors . CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLBX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. CWGCX (16.26). RGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.37 vs. CWGCX (32.96).
| CWGCX | RGLBX | CWGCX / RGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.53 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.53 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 11.127 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 21.5B | 726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.30 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 18.35 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 58.85 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 50.37 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement