Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLDX
CWGCX vs RGLDX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLDX
CWGCX vs RGLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLDX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLDX (21.5B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLDX: CWGCX (0.75) vs RGLDX (0.51). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLDX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLDX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLDX (1.17). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLDX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLDX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. CWGCX (16.95). RGLDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. CWGCX (28.08).
| CWGCX | RGLDX | CWGCX / RGLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.17 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.279 | 7.899 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.51 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.95 | 18.67 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 54.06 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.08 | 47.63 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers