Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLEX
CWGCX vs RGLEX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLEX
CWGCX vs RGLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and RGLEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLEX (21.5B). RGLEX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGLEX (0.80) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLEX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLEX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLEX (0.80). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLEX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.86 vs. CWGCX (17.91). RGLEX return over 5 years is better than : 50.81 vs. CWGCX (28.03).
| CWGCX | RGLEX | CWGCX / RGLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 8.274 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 20.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 56.92 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 50.81 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers