Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLEX
CWGCX vs RGLEX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLEX
CWGCX vs RGLEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLEX (21.7B). RGLEX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGLEX (0.79) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLEX: CWGCX (26 years) vs RGLEX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLEX (0.80). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLEX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. CWGCX (10.62). RGLEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.21 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | RGLEX | CWGCX / RGLEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.80 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 9.936 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.79 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 14.01 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 59.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 51.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers