Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLFX
CWGCX vs RGLFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLFX
CWGCX vs RGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLFX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLFX (21.7B). RGLFX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGLFX (1.03) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLFX: CWGCX (26 years) vs RGLFX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLFX (0.51). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLFX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.50 vs. CWGCX (9.56). RGLFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.82 vs. CWGCX (27.09).
| CWGCX | RGLFX | CWGCX / RGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.51 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.51 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.134 | 9.165 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.03 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 13.50 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.14 | 59.19 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.09 | 51.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers