Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLHX
CWGCX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLHX
CWGCX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLHX (21.7B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWGCX (0.71) vs RGLHX (0.47). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWGCX (26 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLHX (1.24). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. CWGCX (10.62). RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 48.45 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | RGLHX | CWGCX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.24 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.24 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 9.619 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 21.7B | 728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.47 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 13.60 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 57.40 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 48.45 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers