Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLHX
CWGCX vs RGLHX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLHX
CWGCX vs RGLHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and RGLHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. RGLHX (20.6B). CWGCX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: CWGCX (0.75) vs RGLHX (0.48). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLHX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLHX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLHX (1.24). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX (21.62) and CWGCX (21.48) have marching annual gain over last year. RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. CWGCX (31.41).
| CWGCX | RGLHX | CWGCX / RGLHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.24 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.24 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.310 | 9.302 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 20.6B | 738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.48 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.48 | 21.62 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.16 | 57.41 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.41 | 50.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement