Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs RGLJX
CWGCX vs RGLJX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs RGLJX
CWGCX vs RGLJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. RGLJX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and RGLJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLJX (21.5B). RGLJX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: RGLJX (0.97) vs CWGCX (0.75). CWGCX was incepted earlier than RGLJX: CWGCX (25 years) vs RGLJX (7 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RGLJX (0.71). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLJX (35.00). CWGCX (250) and RGLJX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.54 vs. CWGCX (20.87). RGLJX return over 5 years is better than : 56.55 vs. CWGCX (31.28).
| CWGCX | RGLJX | CWGCX / RGLJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.60 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.71 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 10.554 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 21.5B | 744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.97 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 24.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | 61.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | 56.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement