Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs TNBAX
CWGCX vs TNBAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs TNBAX
CWGCX vs TNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. TNBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and TNBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. TNBAX (291M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than TNBAX: CWGCX (0.72) vs TNBAX (0.56). CWGCX was incepted earlier than TNBAX: CWGCX (25 years) vs TNBAX (12 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than TNBAX (1.33). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBAX (33.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBAX: CWGCX (250) vs TNBAX (1000). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. TNBAX (7.59). TNBAX (30.36) and CWGCX (29.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CWGCX | TNBAX | CWGCX / TNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.33 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.549 | 6.093 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 291M | 54,296% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 7.59 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 36.57 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 30.36 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 120.74 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement