Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs TNBRX
CWGCX vs TNBRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs TNBRX
CWGCX vs TNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. TNBRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a StrongBuy and TNBRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. TNBRX (296M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than TNBRX: CWGCX (0.72) vs TNBRX (0.34). CWGCX was incepted earlier than TNBRX: CWGCX (25 years) vs TNBRX (12 years). TNBRX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. TNBRX (33.00). TNBRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: TNBRX (0) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. TNBRX (6.48). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. TNBRX (28.40).
| CWGCX | TNBRX | CWGCX / TNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.35 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.58 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.496 | 7.255 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 296M | 52,703% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.34 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.26 | 6.48 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 42.57 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 28.40 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | 116.33 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement