Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs DGFCX
CWGFX vs DGFCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs DGFCX
CWGFX vs DGFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. DGFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and DGFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. DGFCX (896M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than DGFCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs DGFCX (0.06). CWGFX was incepted earlier than DGFCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs DGFCX (22 years). DGFCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. DGFCX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGFCX: CWGFX (250) vs DGFCX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. DGFCX (9.15). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. DGFCX (-5.25).
| CWGFX | DGFCX | CWGFX / DGFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.75 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.75 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | -1.491 | -899% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 896M | 17,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.06 | 2,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 9.15 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 36.06 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | -5.25 | -607% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 76.23 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement