Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs DGFCX
CWGFX vs DGFCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs DGFCX
CWGFX vs DGFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. DGFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and DGFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. DGFCX (941M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than DGFCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs DGFCX (0.06). CWGFX was incepted earlier than DGFCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs DGFCX (21 years). DGFCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. DGFCX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGFCX: CWGFX (250) vs DGFCX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. DGFCX (15.03). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. DGFCX (-2.90).
| CWGFX | DGFCX | CWGFX / DGFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.75 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.75 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 3.660 | 427% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 941M | 16,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.06 | 2,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 15.03 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 44.44 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | -2.90 | -1,217% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | 77.23 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers