Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs DGFYX
CWGFX vs DGFYX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs DGFYX
CWGFX vs DGFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. DGFYX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and DGFYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. DGFYX (896M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than DGFYX: CWGFX (1.30) vs DGFYX (0.95). CWGFX was incepted earlier than DGFYX: CWGFX (25 years) vs DGFYX (19 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than DGFYX (0.70). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. DGFYX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGFYX: CWGFX (250) vs DGFYX (5000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.82 vs. DGFYX (11.26). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.16 vs. DGFYX (2.90).
| CWGFX | DGFYX | CWGFX / DGFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.610 | -0.987 | -1,582% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 896M | 17,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.95 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | 11.26 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | 43.43 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 2.90 | 1,213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | 101.21 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement