Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs ERBCX
CWGFX vs ERBCX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs ERBCX
CWGFX vs ERBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. ERBCX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and ERBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. ERBCX (601M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than ERBCX: CWGFX (1.30) vs ERBCX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than ERBCX: CWGFX (25 years) vs ERBCX (16 years). ERBCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). ERBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERBCX: CWGFX (250) vs ERBCX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.85 vs. ERBCX (-0.88). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. ERBCX (-6.02).
| CWGFX | ERBCX | CWGFX / ERBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.87 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.88 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.531 | 8.145 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 601M | 26,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.85 | -0.88 | -1,345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.65 | 11.30 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.81 | -6.02 | -512% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.78 | 33.72 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers