Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTGFX
CWGFX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTGFX
CWGFX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and FTGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTGFX (9.19B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTGFX: CWGFX (1.30) vs FTGFX (0.80). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGFX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. FTGFX (4.35). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. FTGFX (23.26).
| CWGFX | FTGFX | CWGFX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.73 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.73 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 4.219 | 318% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 9.19B | 1,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.80 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 4.35 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 29.07 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 23.26 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 54.08 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers