Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTGFX
CWGFX vs FTGFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTGFX
CWGFX vs FTGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTGFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and FTGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTGFX (9.01B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTGFX: CWGFX (1.29) vs FTGFX (0.79). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTGFX: CWGFX (26 years) vs FTGFX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FTGFX (0.73). FTGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGFX: CWGFX (250) vs FTGFX (100000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. FTGFX (-3.96). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.66 vs. FTGFX (24.70).
| CWGFX | FTGFX | CWGFX / FTGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.73 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.73 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 4.395 | 364% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 9.01B | 1,754% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.79 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | -3.96 | -290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 27.15 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 24.70 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | 41.82 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement