Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTGQX
CWGFX vs FTGQX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTGQX
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F1
Price$74.88
Change+$0.24 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.42B
Templeton Growth C
Price$29.97
Change+$0.20 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.15B
CWGFX vs FTGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTGQX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and FTGQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FTGQX (9.15B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: CWGFX (1.39) vs FTGQX (0.74). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTGQX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTGQX (7 years). FTGQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.80). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.43 vs. CWGFX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGQX: CWGFX (250) vs FTGQX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. FTGQX (12.26). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.93 vs. FTGQX (46.29).
| CWGFX | FTGQX | CWGFX / FTGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.690 | 17.113 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 9.15B | 1,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.74 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 12.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.28 | 51.74 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.93 | 46.29 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement