Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTGQX
CWGFX vs FTGQX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTGQX
CWGFX vs FTGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTGQX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and FTGQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTGQX (9.19B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTGQX: CWGFX (1.30) vs FTGQX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTGQX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTGQX (8 years). FTGQX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). FTGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.81 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTGQX: CWGFX (250) vs FTGQX (1000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. FTGQX (1.33). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. FTGQX (15.12).
| CWGFX | FTGQX | CWGFX / FTGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.78 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.78 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 3.081 | 435% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 9.19B | 1,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 1.33 | 1,410% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 23.59 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 15.12 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement