Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and FTWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. FTWRX (2.97B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.30) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. FTWRX (11.00). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. FTWRX (26.97).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.76 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 8.085 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152B | 2.97B | 5,120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 11.00 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.53 | 46.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 26.97 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.29 | 42.08 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers