Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and FTWRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FTWRX (2.9B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.31) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. FTWRX (2.81). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.91 vs. FTWRX (30.38).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.76 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.994 | 7.748 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 2.9B | 5,389% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 2.81 | 611% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.63 | 43.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 30.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | 37.25 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers