Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and FTWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FTWRX (2.91B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.30) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. FTWRX (9.81). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. FTWRX (28.40).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.76 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 7.355 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 2.91B | 5,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 9.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 44.24 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 28.40 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 50.14 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers