Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and FTWRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTWRX (2.87B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.31) vs FTWRX (0.00). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. FTWRX (1.42). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. FTWRX (26.93).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.76 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 6.064 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.87B | 5,515% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 1.42 | 1,096% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 35.57 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 26.93 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 41.12 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers