Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs GCEAX
CWGFX vs GCEAX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs GCEAX
CWGFX vs GCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. GCEAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and GCEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. GCEAX (1.45B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than GCEAX: CWGFX (1.30) vs GCEAX (0.55). CWGFX was incepted earlier than GCEAX: CWGFX (25 years) vs GCEAX (12 years). GCEAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). GCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCEAX: CWGFX (250) vs GCEAX (2500). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.82 vs. GCEAX (2.80). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.85 vs. GCEAX (9.05).
| CWGFX | GCEAX | CWGFX / GCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.03 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.03 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 5.464 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 1.45B | 11,065% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.55 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 2.80 | 671% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 28.92 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 9.05 | 352% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 104.91 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement