Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs GDGSX
CWGFX vs GDGSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs GDGSX
CWGFX vs GDGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. GDGSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and GDGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. GDGSX (66.3M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than GDGSX: CWGFX (1.30) vs GDGSX (0.38). CWGFX was incepted earlier than GDGSX: CWGFX (25 years) vs GDGSX (18 years). GDGSX (1.25) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GDGSX (3.52). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GDGSX: CWGFX (250) vs GDGSX (5000). CWGFX (18.82) and GDGSX (18.72) have marching annual gain over last year. GDGSX return over 5 years is better than : 58.44 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | GDGSX | CWGFX / GDGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.25 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.25 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 7.484 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 66.3M | 241,327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.38 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 18.72 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 57.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 58.44 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 197.74 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement