Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs IESGX
CWGFX vs IESGX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs IESGX
CWGFX vs IESGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. IESGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and IESGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. IESGX (15M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than IESGX: CWGFX (1.30) vs IESGX (0.51). CWGFX was incepted earlier than IESGX: CWGFX (25 years) vs IESGX (10 years). IESGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IESGX (3.88). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IESGX: CWGFX (250) vs IESGX (100000). IESGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.87 vs. CWGFX (14.10). IESGX return over 5 years is better than : 55.45 vs. CWGFX (31.04).
| CWGFX | IESGX | CWGFX / IESGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.01 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.01 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.209 | 7.080 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 15M | 1,053,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.51 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 15.87 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.01 | 60.95 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 55.45 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 199.94 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers