Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (399M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGFX (250). LGCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.64 vs. CWGFX (15.78). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.31 vs. CWGFX (34.23).
| CWGFX | LGCFX | CWGFX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.75 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.367 | 8.032 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 399M | 39,599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.38 | 341% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.78 | 16.64 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.48 | 64.86 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.23 | 41.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement