Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCFX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and LGCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCFX (392M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCFX (9 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.24 vs. LGCFX (18.84). LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. CWGFX (35.41).
| CWGFX | LGCFX | CWGFX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.75 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.508 | 7.189 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 392M | 40,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.38 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.24 | 18.84 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.36 | 68.20 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.41 | 41.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers