Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCFX
CWGFX vs LGCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCFX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCFX (404M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCFX: CWGFX (1.31) vs LGCFX (0.38). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCFX (10 years). LGCFX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). LGCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCFX (0) vs CWGFX (250). LGCFX (17.92) and CWGFX (17.92) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.95 vs. CWGFX (35.43).
| CWGFX | LGCFX | CWGFX / LGCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.75 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.079 | 12.246 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 404M | 39,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.38 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.92 | 17.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.35 | 72.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 42.95 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement