Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCOX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCOX (397M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCOX: CWGFX (1.31) vs LGCOX (0.66). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCOX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCOX (9 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LGCOX (0.70). LGCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCOX (0) vs CWGFX (250). LGCOX (15.57) and CWGFX (15.55) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCOX return over 5 years is better than : 40.77 vs. CWGFX (32.96).
| CWGFX | LGCOX | CWGFX / LGCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.56 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 8.263 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 397M | 39,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.66 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 15.57 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 64.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 40.77 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |