Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCOX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and LGCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCOX (398M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCOX: CWGFX (1.30) vs LGCOX (0.66). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCOX: CWGFX (25 years) vs LGCOX (9 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LGCOX (0.70). LGCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCOX (0) vs CWGFX (250). LGCOX (21.87) and CWGFX (21.82) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCOX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. CWGFX (35.16).
| CWGFX | LGCOX | CWGFX / LGCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.56 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.610 | 8.956 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 398M | 40,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.66 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.82 | 21.87 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.10 | 75.50 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 42.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement