Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs LGCOX
CWGFX vs LGCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. LGCOX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and LGCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCOX (388M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than LGCOX: CWGFX (1.29) vs LGCOX (0.64). CWGFX was incepted earlier than LGCOX: CWGFX (26 years) vs LGCOX (9 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LGCOX (0.70). LGCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). LGCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: LGCOX (0) vs CWGFX (250). CWGFX (11.47) and LGCOX (11.16) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCOX return over 5 years is better than : 40.26 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| CWGFX | LGCOX | CWGFX / LGCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.56 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.977 | 9.748 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 388M | 40,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.64 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 11.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 73.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.66 | 40.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement